5 ms·
"… Men and women's brains are connected in different ways which may explain why the sexes excel at certain tasks, say researchers. A US team at the University o
by rpaddock 3y ago
"… Men and women's brains are connected in different ways which may explain why the sexes excel at certain tasks, say researchers. A US team at the University of Pennsylvania scanned the brains of nearly 1,000 men, women, boys and girls and found striking differences.
Male brains appeared to be wired front to back, with few connections bridging the two hemispheres. In females, the pathways criss-crossed between left and right. ... "
https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1316909110 https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1316909110
- jojobas 3y ago[flagged]
- zapdrive 3y ago[flagged]
- nonethewiser 3y agoSeems like a pretty fundamental difference
- bena 3y agoThis seems like a wicked study. By starting with 8 year olds, you've selected people who have already developed somewhat. It's quite possible these differences are developed. Partly by reinforcement of norms. We believe boys are more spatially oriented, so we treat them as such, and we implicitly train them to be, this then begins developing those pathways. But you can't run the study to see if you could develop girls in similar ways. The amount of controls and isolation required to run the study properly is a bit inhumane. You'd need 24 hour control over everything that child learns and encounters. So while the conclusions may be true, it's possible that it's not an inherent difference due to initial biology.
- ben_w 3y agoOne thing I wonder about whenever "the brains of men and women have systematically different structures" comes up, is what structures do the brains of trans people demonstrate?
- C-x_C-f 3y agoThere's not many studies but they generally show that the brain reflects the gender (i.e. a trans woman's brain looks more like a cis woman's than a cis man's), see e.g. https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/131/12/3132/295849?login=false https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/131/12/3132/295849?lo...
- nonethewiser 3y agoWhy do you wonder that? Because if brain structure is shaped by environment then it tells us nothing. If it’s not shaped by environment and brain structure is a fundamental biological difference then it provides some signal.
- ben_w 3y agoI don't think it matters so much to me why someone has a particular gender identity — if that's physiology or environment — but I think it would still be interesting to be able to determine independently of self-identification.
- digging 3y agoOne option to investigate this would be to study children from highly varied cultures around the world. In fact it seems almost obvious that the study of brains is nearly worthless without such diversity. But that would be difficult and expensive.
- amanaplanacanal 3y agoAlso: how much diversity is enough? I strongly suspect that the invention of agriculture had major effects on the social differences between men and women. You would have to include hunter-gatherers in your study to account for this possible effect, and I’m not sure how you would find enough left to do that.
- pessimizer 3y agoSeems like another deceptive statistical study that probably doesn't even control for brain size. It also seems to have discovered that women probably mix up their logic and "intuitive modes", as we always thought. And why would they further show statistics by race rather than by brain size? Brain sizes affect the density of connections and proportions of white matter to grey matter, so comparing small-brained women and men to large-brained women and men would seem like an obvious thing to do if you have the data [edit: but this is obviously me just desperately looking for a control.] Instead, I suspect they were fishing to find out some headline-grabbing result, hoping that (for example) black women were more masculine than white women, or Asian men were more feminine than white men. On the mis-presentation and misinterpretation of gender-related data: The case of Ingalhalikar’s human connectome study https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1323319111 https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1323319111
- rayiner 3y ago> Instead, I suspect they were fishing to find out some headline-grabbing result, hoping that (for example) black women were more masculine than white women, or Asian men were more feminine than white men. That’s quite a bomb to throw with zero evidence. Like, why does your mind even jump to that?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]