3 ms·
I’m hesitant to comment on this because we are so far off topic. But I’m not sure this is the take I would have on Hunter Biden. > Unless you think you can us
by r3trohack3r 4y ago
I’m hesitant to comment on this because we are so far off topic.
But I’m not sure this is the take I would have on Hunter Biden.
> Unless you think you can use politician children against them.
As a senator, Joseph Biden went through tough on crime phases and his hands are not clean in the war on drugs.
There are a lot of single family houses in the U.S. whose children grew up talking to dad through a plexiglass window, all over hookers and powder.
These policies have ruined families, ruined childhoods, and destroyed communities. And Senator Joseph Biden was, and continues to be, a part of that damage by shaping the policies that sent dads to jail.
Then hookers and powder show up on his back porch. Now it’s a different story. His grandchildren don’t have to talk to dad through a plexiglass window. His grandchildren don’t have to grow up in a single parent household.
I’m not saying we should do that to his grandchildren, that would be awful. I’m saying send those dads you locked up for hookers and powder home to their families.
- orwin 4y agoI did not comment on that, nor on Biden's hypocrisy. The comment i was responding to was a comment on how top-level government employees should be barred from using their own stuff to bypass federal obligations. Gp talked about media platform, and my parent said basically : "hosting your own mail server and bringing your laptop to a repair shop should be forbidden to". I wholly agree for the first, and hard disagree on the second, because i do not think the children of politicians should be impaired or targeted because of the job of their parents. At most by the IRS and FTC, by a transpartisan audit unit specialized in dealing with politicians (Hi Pelosi!), and even then, only if their parent's stuff look weird.