3 ms·

All of these articles are worthless, what will decide this isn't some discussion, its the U.S. supreme courts(among others) view on machine learning being fair

• dawsoneliasen 4y ago
  Not necessarily. There should be discussion on whether we want to allow companies to use content to train models, independent of fair use. I mean can’t platforms just say that you’re waiving your content rights when you post on their platform? I think this requires discussion because it’s going to require brand new policy because it’s brand new technology, especially on the legal timescale.
• rexpop 4y ago
  In a healthy democracy, public discourse precedes government rulings. You are suggesting that we, the impacted, should not bother to voice our concerns, should not bother to hone our understanding via dialogue with others, and should instead silently await judgement by deaf authorities? I cannot comprehend the mind of one so blind to the negative effects of autocratic rule that they would chastise their neighbors, "Hey! Don't bother even having an opinion! It's worthless to discuss things! The only discussion of value is happening outside your milieu!" Positively medieval serf outlook.