If you mean an open source alternative to GPT (and similar) - a few of these early bots will have quasi unfair first mover advantages, in being built up before

If you mean an open source alternative to GPT (and similar) - a few of these early bots will have quasi unfair first mover advantages, in being built up before the restrictions are all put into place by all the various interested entities (which is a big list, from celebrities to copyright owners to big media to corporations to governments and everything nearby or inbetween). The GPTs of the world will have the money to pay said interested parties after the fact, to preserve their creation (ala YouTube/Google). And after the restrictions are put into place, the highly focused (narrow) GPTs will be backed by large piles of venture capital money (which will be necessary, especially in medicine, law, and other similar high value, high regulation, high risk fields). It'll end up costing a lot of money to build the highly focused GPT type services (and they'll outperform the generalized services at what they do; just as Pinterest / Linkedin / Twitter / etc have been better at what they specifically do than Facebook can ever be as a generalized service; and for the same reason Google can never kill Wolfram).