29 ms·
It's not. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35667806 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35667806 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35667013 https://ne
by belltaco 4y ago
It's not.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35667806 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35667806
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35667013 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35667013
- micromacrofoot 4y agoyeah and there are already plenty of comments explaining how these are irrelevant- you can’t just connect adjacent studies by assumption and have those assumptions be true
- belltaco 4y ago> there are already plenty of comments explaining how these are irrelevant Examples? Or maybe you have none because it's handwaving. > you can’t just connect adjacent studies by assumption and have those assumptions be true Source? You absolutely can, it's called transitive logic. Scientists, especially multidisciplinary ones, do this everyday. Maybe you have some research to share instead of low effort dismissive comments that add nothing to the convo except noise.
- dekhn 4y agoAre you a scientist?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- micromacrofoot 4y agoyeah and they actually run studies to validate the theory instead of posting it online as if it’s fact