4 ms·
I agree that you shouldn't dismiss an airplane by the fact that it doesn't flap its wings, but we also don't call them artificial birds. The debate is around th
by stabbles 4y ago
I agree that you shouldn't dismiss an airplane by the fact that it doesn't flap its wings, but we also don't call them artificial birds. The debate is around the word 'intelligence', which is misleading.
- zild3d 4y agoPersonally, I prefer almond milk in my cereal
- circuit10 4y agoBut it’s not called artificial humanity, it’s called artificial intelligence. So what you’re saying is like saying planes don’t fly
- Closi 4y agoI guess there is also a point which is that it isn't 'artificial' intelligence - it is just intelligence. Like we don't say that planes artificially fly, they just fly. I mean technically it's non-natural flight, but it's interesting to think about.
- MacsHeadroom 3y agoYes, there is no artificial intelligence because it's just intelligence. Whether it was generated from "natural" or "artificial" means (a distinction which quickly breaks down anyway) the intelligence is just intelligence.
- SentientAtom 4y agoSemantics
- IshKebab 4y agoGo and Google "artificial birds" and report back. Look up the definition of "artificial" while you're at it.
- citrusynapse 3y agoNo, he's too busy making genuinely useful comments. Why don't you try it?