4 ms·
I just gave a number of reasons why this is in no way "mysticism" and why it's highly worthy to pursue, so at this point I'll just dismiss your comment as it's
by ETH_start 4y ago
I just gave a number of reasons why this is in no way "mysticism" and why it's highly worthy to pursue, so at this point I'll just dismiss your comment as it's clear you're making zero effort to justify your ultra-cynicism.
- freejazz 4y agoThose aren't reasons, they are conjectures. They are not facts. It is modern mysticism. You have the cynical take on society wherein we are so unable to live on this planet, that we have no choice but to take onto barren wastelands. I'm not cynical at all, you clearly haven't thought through your assertions the slightest bit. On top of that, even granting you a positive outlook on humanity, comes up with the reality where you are saying we need to get off planet now because of a future millions of years away? Give me a break, that's EXACTLY what mysticism is. You might as well be writing a bible.
- ETH_start 4y agoI provided facts that make these projections credible. This bears no resemblance to mysticism. >>You have the cynical take on society wherein we are so unable to live on this planet, We can both live on this planet and harvest massive amounts of resources outside of the planet. It's a strict improvement over being limited to just Earth.
- freejazz 4y ago"In fact, off-worlding all of human civilization's resource extraction and production would do more than any other project to protect Earth's natural habitats while ensuring every individual on Earth can enjoy the high, resource-intensive, quality of life that poeple in the developed world take for granted." Is not a fact