4 ms·
It's banally true that intentionally putting an A.I. in charge of our nucleur arsenal might be dangerous. My point is someone can answer a survey stating A.I.
by staticman2 4y ago
It's banally true that intentionally putting an A.I. in charge of our nucleur arsenal might be dangerous.
My point is someone can answer a survey stating A.I. could destroy our species without believing GPT-4 is existentially dangerous.
- than3 4y agoYou've changed your argument which causes me to be skeptical of your credibility Not everyone is equally educated, the two are not mutually exclusive. People can say either. Educated, rational and reasonable people would say yes on both if they do the risk management analysis and understand the factors driving how it will be used.