3 ms·

Thanks for providing an example, that's what I was wondering about. I don't need to speak Dutch to make a valid argument, based on the synonymous examples alre

Thanks for providing an example, that's what I was wondering about. I don't need to speak Dutch to make a valid argument, based on the synonymous examples already observed, that is a genetic fallacy. Yes, 95% number was contrived for the sake of conversation, based on the article. ChatGPT estimated it's actually around 70%. Sounds like its meaning is incredibly nebulous but maybe a blending of chill and friendly.

Aeolun 4y ago
> I don't need to speak Dutch to make a valid argument Technically not, but practically it really helps your chances of being correct. Without knowing both languages you’re more or less guessing.
- alexfromapex 4y ago
  Correct. Which is why I posed it in the form of a question.