3 ms·
Bear in mind that the report you're referencing (written by Seymour Hersh) has factual issues, and should be taken with a large grain of salt. https://oalexand
by jallasprit 3y ago
Bear in mind that the report you're referencing (written by Seymour Hersh) has factual issues, and should be taken with a large grain of salt. https://oalexanderdk.substack.com/p/blowing-holes-in-seymour-hershs-pipe https://oalexanderdk.substack.com/p/blowing-holes-in-seymour...
- Proven 3y ago[dead]
- ralfd 3y agoThe parents post reference was not to Hersh but to different news reports: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/10/divers-used-chartered-yacht-to-sabotage-nord-stream-pipelines-report https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/10/divers-used-ch... https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/07/us/politics/nord-stream-pipeline-sabotage-ukraine.html https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/07/us/politics/nord-stream-p... NYTimes: “Intelligence Suggests Pro-Ukrainian Group Sabotaged Pipelines, U.S. Officials Say New intelligence reporting amounts to the first significant known lead about who was responsible for the attack on the Nord” Opinions differ if that sounds plausible or is a false lead (honest mistake) or a false flag operation (by Russia) or a double false flag (by the US).