3 ms·
No it isn't, it's extremely accurate but it's minimally (or concisely) descriptive. To be "extremely descriptive" it would need to describe it in enough detai
by swores 4y ago
No it isn't, it's extremely accurate but it's minimally (or concisely) descriptive.
To be "extremely descriptive" it would need to describe it in enough detail to consider extreme (what kind of clock, what does it look like, how is it made, etc).
The current title is like calling a Rembrandt painting "Picture"; completely accurate, but hardly capturing its essence (nor "extremely descriptive").
- Aeolun 4y agoI see your point, bit I think it depends on what you are comparing it to. I think the problem is that a lot of titles are neither accurate nor descriptive, and in that comparison “Clock” beats a lot of them as well as covering the essence of 75% of what you are going to be looking at. If this had been described as “Time” that would’ve left you wondering.