3 ms·
...which will make it easier to websites to identify and track you.
by rwalle 3y ago
...which will make it easier to websites to identify and track you.
- olalonde 3y agoI honestly don't mind. The popups have a far more negative impact on my life. If I actually mind, which is very rare, I just open an Incognito window.
- quicklime 3y agoWe used to have a header for this but the tracking companies refused to play ball. DNT: 0
- phendrenad2 3y agoI honestly appreciate this bit of twisted propaganda. It's like you put up a barbed-wire fence with a gate in it, and people objected to the barbed-wire fence, so you put up a 1meter brick wall that people have to climb over. Whenever people complain about the wall, you say "Hey, the fence had a gate in it! But nobody wanted to play ball..."
- Dylan16807 3y agoWho put up the fence and who are the people in this analogy? I'm really confused. It was the tracking advertisers who wouldn't play ball, so are you saying people are unfairly putting barriers in the way of tracking advertisers?
- TylerE 3y agoThe evil bit, but meant non ironically.
- Moldoteck 3y agoBut incognito will not save you. Your browser can be fingerprinted even in incognito. That's why gdpr exists. Also it's strange how your default proposed flag is in favor of tracking. Why not have a flag that is defaulted to notrack:true instead?
- vsl 3y agoSigh. Because OP doesn’t give a fuck. It’s right there. You’re proposing DNT flag. We’ve been there, done that, it failed. Pragmatically, the opposite flag has a better chance of being adopted, because it aligns incentives - both parties get what they want: the website can track me (and really: some people don’t give a fuck and don’t need lectures on the wrongness of their ways), I get less annoying UI.
- oehpr 3y agoExactly. Don't negotiate with people who operate in bad faith.