7 ms·

It's what the phrase "the customer is always right" originally meant. It means you can do all the market research, development, testing, polling, and seeding to

It's what the phrase "the customer is always right" originally meant. It means you can do all the market research, development, testing, polling, and seeding to sell a product. But the ultimate decider of whether the product is "good" is whether or not the people buy it. If your sales plan flops don't say "it's not the product's fault, I just need to do a better job marketing it." No, the product is wrong, the customer is right. Don't try to change peoples' behavior, instead change your marketing to target what people are actually buying. That could mean scrapping the project because it's unpopular, but could also mean narrowing the focus to the smaller population that really does want what you're selling. Well, that's what it originally meant. Nowadays it's been twisted to mean reacting to every minor complaint and demand in order to retain existing customers, no matter how unreasonable or costly the effort. Rather than helping increase productivity it's become a weapon to punish subordinate sales staffs.

test1235 4y ago
I think the original saying was longer, and something along the lines of, "the customer is always right when it comes to taste".
- Dylan16807 4y ago
  No, that's a more recent thing.
cduzz 4y ago
Please define "Customer" in this context? There are several parties at this party. One is the person who bought a computer with an operating system on it; possibly they even paid for the operating system itself, though more likely they are using the operating system that came on the computer they're using. Another party is the one who bought a license from microsoft; occasionally they're the same party but more typically it is some sort of vendor who did this. And there's also the party that's giving microsoft money to put advertising in front of the "consumer." So -- it isn't clear to me who in this context is "always right"
- alex_young 4y ago
  If you buy a car from a dealership does that make you less of a customer of the manufacturer?
  - cduzz 4y ago
    If you buy a car from a dealership, then yes indeed you are "less" of a customer of the manufacturer. Consider this relationship: Toyota makes a car to the specifications of general motors, who brands the car as a "Pontiac Vibe" and sells the car to a Pontiac dealership. The Pontiac dealership then sells you the car at mostly a wash because you're also financing the purchase and they want to sell "your" loan to a loan bundler and reseller. So -- everyone gets a cut, and almost nobody's actually got a direct interest in how the schlub who buys a car feels about the car.
    - alex_young 4y ago
      I don't believe you've proven the point you're attempting to make. Tesla is a rather famous example of a car manufacturer that doesn't have a dealership model. Do you imagine that GM or Toyota is somehow less interested in how their cars are either liked or disliked by their target audiences than Tesla is? That seems pretty hard to imagine.
      - cduzz 4y ago
        I'll try to be clear here: Microsoft is selling your eyeballs to advertisers: You are the product not the customer. Vendors are buying windows from Microsoft and installing it onto a computer and selling that computer to you. You are buying a computer not windows. If you need support you talk to the vendor, not microsoft. The vendor is the customer to Microsoft, not you. And regarding cars -- car companies make lots of crappy cars and sell them to dealerships who have to buy them regardless of if they want them or not. The dealerships are the customers of the car companies. You are a customer of the dealership. 99% of the time if you've got a problem with the car, the manufacturer is going to be of limited use to you.
toss1 4y ago
>>That could mean scrapping the project because it's unpopular, but could also mean narrowing the focus to the smaller population that really does want what you're selling. ... or, keep improving the product to the point where most people actually find it useful, which is obviously an option for Microsoft, with cash reserves to fund centuries of development. Find out what the downsides are, and fix them, or offer actually compelling benefits. Heck, I'm very hard-set against it, but I just heard about Apple starting to offer savings accts with 4.5% interest. If MS started paying that much, with trustworthy security and no upper limit, I might sign up (i.e., if you pay me enough, I might also accept your other parts of the offer). It must be damn valuable for MS to have us have accounts, and if so, they could actually afford to provide better returns than banks, because the return to MS would be [banking profit] + [network profit].
- JohnFen 4y ago
  > or, keep improving the product to the point where most people actually find it useful Some product ideas can't be made desirable and useful no matter how much improvement they get.
  - toss1 4y ago
    True, but you start paying enough, and you'll get bigger and bigger populations who find it an acceptable bargain. You'll also always have some who see through it.
  - cduzz 4y ago
    Desirable to who ? Windows 11 users are the product not the _customer_ You, a windows 11 licensee, are a captive market for microsoft to sell your eyeballs to advertisers. "I am going to sell clicks to advertisers and the cost of customer acquisition is negative $10 per customer -- they pay us to get advertised to!"
msla 4y ago
It doesn't matter how much you paid: You aren't the customer, you're the product.
- soraminazuki 4y ago
  There's a saying in Japanese that precisely describes this situation: 鴨が葱を背負ってくる. The literal translation is "a duck approaches you with a leek on its back." It refers to good luck brought by someone waiting to be exploited. Paying money for a product that works against you is exactly this.
  - dlivingston 4y ago
    That description sounds very similar to the Farfetch'd Pokemon [0]. Was that the original influence? [0]: https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Farfetch%27d_(Pok%C3%A9mon) https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Farfetch%27d_(Pok%C3...
    - soraminazuki 4y ago
      It probably is, and the English name for that Pokemon is a reflection of that. How likely would duck come along carrying ingredients for stew? That’d be “far-fetched.”
    - guffins 4y ago
      Someone’s essay on that theory: https://bulbanews.bulbagarden.net/wiki/On_the_Origin_of_Species:_Farfetch%27d https://bulbanews.bulbagarden.net/wiki/On_the_Origin_of_Spec...
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
hdjjhhvvhga 4y ago
One thing is clear: MS doesn't really care about customer satisfaction at all. There is no single innovative thing in Windows 11 that would make me switch over. I use Windows 11 on company machines only; I don't understand why anyone would voluntarily put up with this crap.
- rthomas6 4y ago
  The next time I build a gaming computer, I'm gonna hold my nose and do it. I know Proton is good, but it is still a compromise for a lot of games.
- jbarrs 4y ago
  Because Microsoft almost have a monopoly on the OS market. Pretty much the only alternative for users who aren't tech savvy enough to comfortably use Linux is to buy a Mac, which will price out a lot of people. Even if you are able to use Linux (or can afford a Mac), the popularity of Windows means that you will eventually run into a piece of software you need that isn't available for your OS and won't run in Wine, forcing you to use Windows by some other means.

test1235 4y ago

I think the original saying was longer, and something along the lines of, "the customer is always right when it comes to taste".

Dylan16807 4y ago
No, that's a more recent thing.

cduzz 4y ago

Please define "Customer" in this context? There are several parties at this party. One is the person who bought a computer with an operating system on it; possibly they even paid for the operating system itself, though more likely they are using the operating system that came on the computer they're using. Another party is the one who bought a license from microsoft; occasionally they're the same party but more typically it is some sort of vendor who did this. And there's also the party that's giving microsoft money to put advertising in front of the "consumer." So -- it isn't clear to me who in this context is "always right"

alex_young 4y ago
If you buy a car from a dealership does that make you less of a customer of the manufacturer?
- cduzz 4y ago
  If you buy a car from a dealership, then yes indeed you are "less" of a customer of the manufacturer. Consider this relationship: Toyota makes a car to the specifications of general motors, who brands the car as a "Pontiac Vibe" and sells the car to a Pontiac dealership. The Pontiac dealership then sells you the car at mostly a wash because you're also financing the purchase and they want to sell "your" loan to a loan bundler and reseller. So -- everyone gets a cut, and almost nobody's actually got a direct interest in how the schlub who buys a car feels about the car.
  - alex_young 4y ago
    I don't believe you've proven the point you're attempting to make. Tesla is a rather famous example of a car manufacturer that doesn't have a dealership model. Do you imagine that GM or Toyota is somehow less interested in how their cars are either liked or disliked by their target audiences than Tesla is? That seems pretty hard to imagine.
    - cduzz 4y ago
      I'll try to be clear here: Microsoft is selling your eyeballs to advertisers: You are the product not the customer. Vendors are buying windows from Microsoft and installing it onto a computer and selling that computer to you. You are buying a computer not windows. If you need support you talk to the vendor, not microsoft. The vendor is the customer to Microsoft, not you. And regarding cars -- car companies make lots of crappy cars and sell them to dealerships who have to buy them regardless of if they want them or not. The dealerships are the customers of the car companies. You are a customer of the dealership. 99% of the time if you've got a problem with the car, the manufacturer is going to be of limited use to you.

toss1 4y ago

>>That could mean scrapping the project because it's unpopular, but could also mean narrowing the focus to the smaller population that really does want what you're selling. ... or, keep improving the product to the point where most people actually find it useful, which is obviously an option for Microsoft, with cash reserves to fund centuries of development. Find out what the downsides are, and fix them, or offer actually compelling benefits. Heck, I'm very hard-set against it, but I just heard about Apple starting to offer savings accts with 4.5% interest. If MS started paying that much, with trustworthy security and no upper limit, I might sign up (i.e., if you pay me enough, I might also accept your other parts of the offer). It must be damn valuable for MS to have us have accounts, and if so, they could actually afford to provide better returns than banks, because the return to MS would be [banking profit] + [network profit].

JohnFen 4y ago
> or, keep improving the product to the point where most people actually find it useful Some product ideas can't be made desirable and useful no matter how much improvement they get.
- toss1 4y ago
  True, but you start paying enough, and you'll get bigger and bigger populations who find it an acceptable bargain. You'll also always have some who see through it.
- cduzz 4y ago
  Desirable to who ? Windows 11 users are the product not the _customer_ You, a windows 11 licensee, are a captive market for microsoft to sell your eyeballs to advertisers. "I am going to sell clicks to advertisers and the cost of customer acquisition is negative $10 per customer -- they pay us to get advertised to!"

msla 4y ago

It doesn't matter how much you paid: You aren't the customer, you're the product.

soraminazuki 4y ago
There's a saying in Japanese that precisely describes this situation: 鴨が葱を背負ってくる. The literal translation is "a duck approaches you with a leek on its back." It refers to good luck brought by someone waiting to be exploited. Paying money for a product that works against you is exactly this.
- dlivingston 4y ago
  That description sounds very similar to the Farfetch'd Pokemon [0]. Was that the original influence? [0]: https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Farfetch%27d_(Pok%C3%A9mon) https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Farfetch%27d_(Pok%C3...
  - soraminazuki 4y ago
    It probably is, and the English name for that Pokemon is a reflection of that. How likely would duck come along carrying ingredients for stew? That’d be “far-fetched.”
  - guffins 4y ago
    Someone’s essay on that theory: https://bulbanews.bulbagarden.net/wiki/On_the_Origin_of_Species:_Farfetch%27d https://bulbanews.bulbagarden.net/wiki/On_the_Origin_of_Spec...

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

hdjjhhvvhga 4y ago

One thing is clear: MS doesn't really care about customer satisfaction at all. There is no single innovative thing in Windows 11 that would make me switch over. I use Windows 11 on company machines only; I don't understand why anyone would voluntarily put up with this crap.

rthomas6 4y ago
The next time I build a gaming computer, I'm gonna hold my nose and do it. I know Proton is good, but it is still a compromise for a lot of games.
jbarrs 4y ago
Because Microsoft almost have a monopoly on the OS market. Pretty much the only alternative for users who aren't tech savvy enough to comfortably use Linux is to buy a Mac, which will price out a lot of people. Even if you are able to use Linux (or can afford a Mac), the popularity of Windows means that you will eventually run into a piece of software you need that isn't available for your OS and won't run in Wine, forcing you to use Windows by some other means.