5 ms·
That's what I think it should mean, but I see very few discussions these days where anyone uses AGI to describe something that is not superhuman and all of thos
by ChatGTP 4y ago
That's what I think it should mean, but I see very few discussions these days where anyone uses AGI to describe something that is not superhuman and all of those other traits. So trying to use it as "general problem solver" which makes more sense to me also, is going to confuse most people.
Because almost everyone including top researches assume that once an AGI is a thing, it will quite rapidly become an ASI.
- ilaksh 4y agoBut if you look into detail about what they are saying, they are talking about animal/human-like conscious digital beings that have thousands or millions of times the performance of a human. So they are also making a leap there between something that is general purpose and that.
- ChatGTP 4y agoYes, that’s why it’s alarming…