4 ms·
Am I the only one that feels like this article really doesn't say anything at all? Sure most of the work in the computing world is done by scripts (written by
by stoniejohnson 4y ago
Am I the only one that feels like this article really doesn't say anything at all?
Sure most of the work in the computing world is done by scripts (written by humans).
Sure if an AI can magically write/manage all those scripts that would be great.
I don't really see anything beyond someone creating an artificial divide in computing that I don't really see as relevant ("batch" vs using a literal app with an AI feature).
Of course most computing doesn't require a person to be interacting with it.
I'm being genuine here; please clarify if I'm just lacking context.
- baxtr 4y agoI’m just waiting for a fancy marketing term to appear for this. And then big cos will jump the bandwagon and we’ll have a new trend!
- precompute 4y agoCall them "AI Managers". They manage AI, but they're not managers that are AI, hence securing high-paid managerial jobs. Checkmate.
- moonchrome 4y agoI prefer AI whisperer. Manager sounds so pedestrian.
- Nevermark 4y agoAI Conductor?
- SanderNL 4y agoAI-Enhanced Batch Processing (AIEBP) IntelliBatch: Intelligent Batch Processing AutomaBatch: Automated Batch Processing with AI I’m getting some real good vibes here. We’re getting close. I’m sure actual enterprise actors can come up with something even worse.
- tudorw 4y agomaigic
- peterpost2 4y agoThink you won the contest here.
- visarga 4y agoI think it is a good idea to give users batch mode, get 10x lower price in exchange for higher latency. If you want to parse millions of documents it is really useful.
- mrighele 4y agoI think what they mean is that for now most of the usage of things Chatgpt, mid journey etc has a human in the loop that helps getting the right result. For example plenty of people post AI generated images on Twitter. This works because they filter and chose what to post among a lot of generated images. If Twitter decided that every single post gets an automatically generated image, first of all they would have to find a way to lower the immense amount of computed power, and secondly to guarantee that every single time the result is valid and consistent in quality.
- civilized 4y agoWhat I got out of it: 1. What if we used foundation models to write code? 2. But the code might not work...
- lumost 4y agoHumans write broken code all the time. Why would we expect a transformer model to get it right on the first shot? shouldn't the model be able to write code, build, test, and iterate?
- civilized 4y agoYou could test that yourself. Ask the model to code, build, test, and iterate. Does it do a better job?
- mr_toad 4y agoThe lack of proper memory hampers current AI. They can’t really test and iterate. Until we have an AI that can truly learn on the job I doubt we’ll be replacing many jobs.
- jjtheblunt 4y agoI was going to say the same thing, and then I also noticed that since the popularity of the transformer model, there sure seems to be a huge influx of Stanford articles. I wonder if that’s coincidence.
- mcbuilder 4y agoLooks like a quick blog post by a PI outlining 3 of their lab's projects and giving a quick overview of their research directions. I wouldn't take it as an informational article in the sense you're looking for. It's more like a press release, and pretty common in academia to release these fluff blog posts.
- j33zusjuice 4y agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_investigator https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_investigator For anyone who doesn’t know what a PI is (I didn’t when I first got a job at a university).
- visarga 4y ago> Of course most computing doesn't require a person to be interacting with it. Most LLM output is worthless before validation. Be it code, problem solving or question answering, they can all be wrong at any time.