5 ms·

> You agree not to use the content to train AI systems or machine learning systems. https://research.exoticsilicon.com/terms https://research.exoticsilicon.com

by 8ig8 3y ago

> You agree not to use the content to train AI systems or machine learning systems. https://research.exoticsilicon.com/terms https://research.exoticsilicon.com/terms First I’ve seen that.

capableweb 3y ago
Seems unlikely to be enforceable as "overly expansive", as someone could surely argue our brains are just AI and/or ML but in organic form. Does that mean I'm not allowed to learn from the website?
- weird-eye-issue 3y ago
  Are you aware of what the "A" in AI and the "M" in ML stand for?
  - capableweb 3y ago
    No, I work in a field without having zero idea what the most basic terminology actually means. Are you aware what "organic" means? Have some imagination. We can call it OI and OL to make it a bit easier if you want.
    - hgsgm 3y ago
      Did you know that different words have different meanings?
    - weird-eye-issue 3y ago
      If you called something OI and OL then you wouldn't be referring to AI and ML. They would be different things. It's clearly big brain time for you...
    - JohnFen 3y ago
      > Are you aware what "organic" means? I am, but I always get an argument when I tell certain people that "all food is organic", despite the fact that's technically correct.
- lelanthran 3y ago
  > as someone could surely argue our brains are just AI and/or ML but in organic form. Our brains are artificial intelligence? Humans are machine learning? I mean, c'mon. If humans are artificial, then what do you call real? If humans are machines, then what on earth isn't?
  - bombcar 3y ago
    I could see an argument that a test tube baby might be something like a human created by artifice.
    - nraynaud 3y ago
      good luck with that, it's pure natural DNA and pure natural gestation and pure old-school education. only the fecondation was provoked.
- pxoe 3y ago
  >someone could surely argue No, they could not. Even if they did, those things are just different. It won't change what AI/ML is, a bunch of bytes in memory and on a disk. Just making a bunch of reaching comparisons, won't absolve AI/ML of responsibility.
- unosama 3y ago
  Neural networks are modeled of human brains in some ways but the majority of AI is not and humans just anthropomorphize the results. Humans don't take in terabytes of data and spend hours fitting a multidimensional regression between labels and the raw data. We build logical connections to understand things over continued exposure. Just because AI "feels" human does not mean it approaches anything actually resembling a human mind. What holds us back from understanding this in the legal system is the fact that lawyers and judges are so technically illiterate.
  - marcosdumay 3y ago
    > Neural networks are modeled of human brains in some ways Hum... Not really. They are modeled after our periferic nervous system. Detailed knowledge about the brain wasn't very available at computer science departments at the time they were created. Besides, they have a much "cleaner" design that would win the computer scientists esthetic preferences every time anyway.

by 8ig8 3y ago

> You agree not to use the content to train AI systems or machine learning systems. https://research.exoticsilicon.com/terms https://research.exoticsilicon.com/terms First I’ve seen that.

capableweb 3y ago

Seems unlikely to be enforceable as "overly expansive", as someone could surely argue our brains are just AI and/or ML but in organic form. Does that mean I'm not allowed to learn from the website?

weird-eye-issue 3y ago
Are you aware of what the "A" in AI and the "M" in ML stand for?
- capableweb 3y ago
  No, I work in a field without having zero idea what the most basic terminology actually means. Are you aware what "organic" means? Have some imagination. We can call it OI and OL to make it a bit easier if you want.
  - hgsgm 3y ago
    Did you know that different words have different meanings?
  - weird-eye-issue 3y ago
    If you called something OI and OL then you wouldn't be referring to AI and ML. They would be different things. It's clearly big brain time for you...
  - JohnFen 3y ago
    > Are you aware what "organic" means? I am, but I always get an argument when I tell certain people that "all food is organic", despite the fact that's technically correct.
lelanthran 3y ago
> as someone could surely argue our brains are just AI and/or ML but in organic form. Our brains are artificial intelligence? Humans are machine learning? I mean, c'mon. If humans are artificial, then what do you call real? If humans are machines, then what on earth isn't?
- bombcar 3y ago
  I could see an argument that a test tube baby might be something like a human created by artifice.
  - nraynaud 3y ago
    good luck with that, it's pure natural DNA and pure natural gestation and pure old-school education. only the fecondation was provoked.
pxoe 3y ago
>someone could surely argue No, they could not. Even if they did, those things are just different. It won't change what AI/ML is, a bunch of bytes in memory and on a disk. Just making a bunch of reaching comparisons, won't absolve AI/ML of responsibility.
unosama 3y ago
Neural networks are modeled of human brains in some ways but the majority of AI is not and humans just anthropomorphize the results. Humans don't take in terabytes of data and spend hours fitting a multidimensional regression between labels and the raw data. We build logical connections to understand things over continued exposure. Just because AI "feels" human does not mean it approaches anything actually resembling a human mind. What holds us back from understanding this in the legal system is the fact that lawyers and judges are so technically illiterate.
- marcosdumay 3y ago
  > Neural networks are modeled of human brains in some ways Hum... Not really. They are modeled after our periferic nervous system. Detailed knowledge about the brain wasn't very available at computer science departments at the time they were created. Besides, they have a much "cleaner" design that would win the computer scientists esthetic preferences every time anyway.