3 ms·

I really doubt there’s any academic rigor behind that tbh

• ctvo 4y ago
  The original claim was the NYT abuses anonymous sources without citing anyone. The NYT, in the only occurrence of "researchers say" in the article, literally quote a person who's written a book on the subject on the next line. We can move the goal post and now debate the person's credentials, but we can do that because we know their name.
  • nonethewiser 4y ago
    He’s not a researcher though. He’s a lecturer.