4 ms·

This assumes those people really do have no other way to contribute. I don’t believe that’s the case. Do you? I believe people can contribute in many different

• somsak2 4y ago
  like what?
• 876978095789789 4y ago
  The issue is not can people contribute in some other way, but can they convince someone else to pay them a living wage for doing so, which is going to prove progressively more difficult as this technology advances.
• 13years 4y ago
  > that frees me up to produce other things for society The problem is that it is a disruption for everything because at its core it is a machine for the replication of skill and technology. A concept that has never existed prior with any other technological disruption. "Climbing the skill ladder is going to look more like running on a treadmill at the gym. No matter how fast you run, you aren’t moving, AI is still right behind you learning everything that you can do." from a more in depth view I wrote up here describing the rapidly shrinking innovation, disruption and adaption cycles https://dakara.substack.com/p/ai-and-the-end-to-all-things https://dakara.substack.com/p/ai-and-the-end-to-all-things
• flandish 4y ago
  > society Sure. But when your “keep the lights on” job cuts you for AI, you are less likely to “produce other things” while you worry about food and heat.