3 ms·

They could break out the transactions explicitly. That would help reduce the feeling that they're taking more than their share, if they're not doing that.

• nicbou 4y ago
  They could also sing a song, do a little dance and tweet a word of praise for your generosity. At some point the dance isn't worth the peanut.
  • coldtea 4y ago
    Well, if they're there to secure a good chunk of peanuts for themselves, for being the intermediator, many would find this shady and wont want to deal with them. Sorry, someone donating $10,000 to their favorite FOSS doesn't want an intermediator to take in $500 just for making the transaction. Even more so when the actual transaction infrastructure is not going to be their's anyway, but some banks or Stripe or whatever.
    • robertlagrant 4y ago
      > Sorry, someone donating $10,000 to their favorite FOSS doesn't want an intermediator to take in $500 just for making the transaction. This phrasing is just inappropriate, and the situation you cite is an extreme. > many would find this shady and wont want to deal with them What's the point of armchair prognostication? We'll find out, and their pricing isn't fixed in stone?