4 ms·
The Bing LM, or rather the service, did have "inner monologue" in the sense of text that it would generate, but not show to the user, and treat as "thoughts" to
by vintermann 4y ago
The Bing LM, or rather the service, did have "inner monologue" in the sense of text that it would generate, but not show to the user, and treat as "thoughts" to guide the generation of an actual reply that the user would see.
We know this because it happily told us, including the json format it uses internally.
- arlcode 4y agoInteresting. I didn't know that. When using gpt-4 directly through the API we can emulate this behavior
- beepbooptheory 4y agoAnd you trust what it told you?
- vintermann 4y agoYup, for the same reason I trust e.g. jailbreaks exposing the prompt: it was consistent. Really, just asking again is a fine way to expose all sorts of "hallucinations" in a LM.
- int_19h 4y agoNo, but the reconstructed examples have "im_start" and "im_end", which strongly implies that it is, if not verbatim, then a close enough restatement of the real deal. Take a look: https://www.make-safe-ai.com/is-bing-chat-safe/Prompts_Conversations.txt https://www.make-safe-ai.com/is-bing-chat-safe/Prompts_Conve...