3 ms·
Which one, the go ahead and "define your own custom loader"? You mean re-implement the image export that is sitting right there in their express server... from
by Kevcmk 3y ago
Which one, the go ahead and "define your own custom loader"? You mean re-implement the image export that is sitting right there in their express server... from scratch? Hah.
NextJS won't let you export their optimized images in a static site export because they want _everything_ running through their Express server.
Why's that great for them? Because they get to charge you for image bandwidth and image optimization. This is called vendor lock in.
Sources:
In vivo (v13.3.0):
> npx next export
<...>
error - Image Optimization using the default loader is not compatible with export.
Possible solutions:
- Use `next start` to run a server, which includes the Image Optimization API.
- Configure `images.unoptimized = true` in `next.config.js` to disable the Image Optimization API.
Read more: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/export-image-api
and https://vercel.com/changelog/changes-to-vercel-image-optimizations https://vercel.com/changelog/changes-to-vercel-image-optimiz...
- Aeolun 3y agoTo be fair, you can optimize images yourself, or just not optimize them at all.
- sshine 3y agoOr use a web framework that gives you optimised images that aren’t vendor-locked. The point is that the library artificially limits capability because it benefits a particular vendor model, not the user.