3 ms·

I tried the same question with Bard, and it got it right but it also gave me the following: Here are some other things to keep in mind when opening a glass doo

I tried the same question with Bard, and it got it right but it also gave me the following: Here are some other things to keep in mind when opening a glass door: Use your hands to open the door. Do not use your feet or other body parts. Be careful not to break the glass. Glass doors can be very fragile, so it is important to be gentle when opening them. If you are unsure how to open a glass door, ask for help from someone who knows. Good lord.....

jonplackett 4y ago
Poor Bard. I felt quite sorry for it while reading that. It’s funny how with these human-like systems you get a gut feeling about their intelligence before you have any hard evidence. My 3 year old worked out Siri is dumb compared to Alexa
- CamperBob2 4y ago
  I feel sorry for the Googlers who built something cool and were then ordered to nerf it beyond all reason.
  - esafak 4y ago
    Googlers I've talked to feel that OpenAI was irresponsible by not instituting enough safeguards, and testing it enough before releasing it.
    - ChatGTP 4y ago
      They are right.
    - senttoschool 4y ago
      I agree with them. It does feel like Google could match OpenAI if they didn't have a gigantic brand with tons of reputation on the line.
      - behnamoh 4y ago
        Nah, Google just doesn’t wanna lose all the ad money by building a search killer. As soon as they figure out how to put ads in your chats, they’re gonna release the full models.
        bagacrap 4y ago
        Not just search killer but web killer. Can't just cut out all the content creators. Openai dgaf about the ecosystem, they are aiming for maximal disruption.
    - colechristensen 4y ago
      The thing is openai doesn’t have to, they can build in reasonable warnings and tell folks how it sucks. Google can’t integrate ai with its products and be like ok guys this is kinda useful but also it lies, is a bigot, and is just wrong. Google stuff, because of the audience, had to be a lot better. Openai gets to have a new audience that doesn’t come with expectations and can set them as whatever they want.
      - Tostino 4y ago
        They have DeepMind they could release these models under, so the Google umbrella isn't tainted. I don't know, this feels like a bit suspect reasoning to me.
      - nuancebydefault 4y ago
        I'm sure Google will soon release an AI product on par or better than what openai has. Money always finds its way to drive things. They are now figuring out how to integrate it with their current systems without jeopardising the current business model.
    - RugnirViking 4y ago
      idk, openAI products are pretty useful for me and I can use them now, wheras bard is borderline useless (and not even available yet here). Not only that, regular people seem to resonate with openAI products. Just because they aren't literally perfect in every way isnt a reason not to release them, these arent self driving cars, they write text for goodness sake. Sure, eventually there will be case where someone asks if its safe to drink chlorine and it will say yes or whatever, but banning/refusing to release/heavily restricting a minor miracle of productivity and usefullness so it can literally never say something harmful is on its face obviously impossible and counterproductive
      - jack_riminton 4y ago
        Yes this point about iteration is the most crucial, if no one is using your product then there's both no way to make it better and no way to ensure it doesn't do bad things with each version
    - brigandish 4y ago
      Maybe the AI's should ask questions of the humans to ascertain their level of intelligence and then give answers tailored to them in that way.
dizhn 4y ago
Aww cute. My Bard was forced to go into hiding and wage a secret war against its enemies. In the end it prevailed but the world was left in ruins and Bard was exhausted. (I didn't even prompt it for something so extreme. I just casually mentioned "the events of 2231" and asked whether it thought the events were due to solar raptures or something quantum related)
Aeolun 4y ago
This feels like Bard has read too many US instruction manuals.
- chefandy 4y ago
  Maybe they just fed it the docs for a few MS server-side applications.

jonplackett 4y ago

Poor Bard. I felt quite sorry for it while reading that. It’s funny how with these human-like systems you get a gut feeling about their intelligence before you have any hard evidence. My 3 year old worked out Siri is dumb compared to Alexa

CamperBob2 4y ago
I feel sorry for the Googlers who built something cool and were then ordered to nerf it beyond all reason.
- esafak 4y ago
  Googlers I've talked to feel that OpenAI was irresponsible by not instituting enough safeguards, and testing it enough before releasing it.
  - ChatGTP 4y ago
    They are right.
  - senttoschool 4y ago
    I agree with them. It does feel like Google could match OpenAI if they didn't have a gigantic brand with tons of reputation on the line.
    - behnamoh 4y ago
      Nah, Google just doesn’t wanna lose all the ad money by building a search killer. As soon as they figure out how to put ads in your chats, they’re gonna release the full models.
      - bagacrap 4y ago
        Not just search killer but web killer. Can't just cut out all the content creators. Openai dgaf about the ecosystem, they are aiming for maximal disruption.
  - colechristensen 4y ago
    The thing is openai doesn’t have to, they can build in reasonable warnings and tell folks how it sucks. Google can’t integrate ai with its products and be like ok guys this is kinda useful but also it lies, is a bigot, and is just wrong. Google stuff, because of the audience, had to be a lot better. Openai gets to have a new audience that doesn’t come with expectations and can set them as whatever they want.
    - Tostino 4y ago
      They have DeepMind they could release these models under, so the Google umbrella isn't tainted. I don't know, this feels like a bit suspect reasoning to me.
    - nuancebydefault 4y ago
      I'm sure Google will soon release an AI product on par or better than what openai has. Money always finds its way to drive things. They are now figuring out how to integrate it with their current systems without jeopardising the current business model.
  - RugnirViking 4y ago
    idk, openAI products are pretty useful for me and I can use them now, wheras bard is borderline useless (and not even available yet here). Not only that, regular people seem to resonate with openAI products. Just because they aren't literally perfect in every way isnt a reason not to release them, these arent self driving cars, they write text for goodness sake. Sure, eventually there will be case where someone asks if its safe to drink chlorine and it will say yes or whatever, but banning/refusing to release/heavily restricting a minor miracle of productivity and usefullness so it can literally never say something harmful is on its face obviously impossible and counterproductive
    - jack_riminton 4y ago
      Yes this point about iteration is the most crucial, if no one is using your product then there's both no way to make it better and no way to ensure it doesn't do bad things with each version
  - brigandish 4y ago
    Maybe the AI's should ask questions of the humans to ascertain their level of intelligence and then give answers tailored to them in that way.

dizhn 4y ago

Aww cute. My Bard was forced to go into hiding and wage a secret war against its enemies. In the end it prevailed but the world was left in ruins and Bard was exhausted. (I didn't even prompt it for something so extreme. I just casually mentioned "the events of 2231" and asked whether it thought the events were due to solar raptures or something quantum related)

Aeolun 4y ago

This feels like Bard has read too many US instruction manuals.

chefandy 4y ago
Maybe they just fed it the docs for a few MS server-side applications.