3 ms·

This isn't news. It's commentary on a ruling that's been discussed to death and most everyone recognizes the IA forfeit their case the moment they started the N

• matwood 4y ago
  Not exactly. The NEL likely pushed publishers to file, but that wasn't what the case was about. The IA lost when they admitted they had no controls in place with library partners - meaning they were not even doing CDL as they themselves defined. And, they had a clear profit motive, the worst of which is linking to BWB (imagine if they had linked to a publishers site for the print copy instead). The IA playing fast and loose is where the fault lies. CDL implemented as defined could have been an interesting case, but that's not what this was.
  • hilbert42 4y ago
    "And, they had a clear profit motive," Uh?
• mdp2021 4y ago
  > This isn't news // discussed to death // most everyone recognizes We are not restricted to "«news»" in that sense, and the submitted "«commentary»" also provides information that was not explicit in past sources. // And part of a matter very much alive. // The case has hit the concept of digital lending on the base of physical possession.