3 ms·
Imagine if they had been growing the nuclear instead of reducing it, it would have allowed to almost get rid of lignite and coal. Instead it is still a portion.
by jenadine 4y ago
Imagine if they had been growing the nuclear instead of reducing it, it would have allowed to almost get rid of lignite and coal.
Instead it is still a portion.
(And solar and wind being intermittent you can't just have that)
- 0x073 4y agoNulcear is only for base load, coal can be used for medium spikes. Nuclear can't replace coal for this.
- Aeolun 4y agoI’m inclined to believe solar and wind have similar percentages of storage available.
- yodelshady 4y agoThat's just a lie.