3 ms·
Uhh no that’s not what I said. I’m pointing out the obvious, that a lot of the people Thiel funds would look down on him for being gay if he wasn’t paying them.
by api 4y ago
Uhh no that’s not what I said. I’m pointing out the obvious, that a lot of the people Thiel funds would look down on him for being gay if he wasn’t paying them.
It’s really stupidly obvious. They go hard anti-gay as soon as they are talking to their base.
It’s strange but there it is.
- honzabe 4y agoI have a new hobby - when I spot a reasoning error, I feed the relevant part of a discussion to GPT-4 to see if it is able to detect that error. Here is what GPT-4 says about this thread: Person 2 seems to have misunderstood Person 1's statement. Person 1 was suggesting that those who support Elon Musk and Peter Thiel, specifically the people who have totalitarian tendencies, would consider Peter Thiel as a "degenerate subhuman" due to his sexual orientation. Person 1 was not expressing their own opinion about gay people... Interesting, right? One of my dreams is that I will soon have an AI detector for flawed reasoning (of others as well as my own).