4 ms·

You can run any process on any core and allocate local memory to that core. What is missing? Sure you can't hide metadata in the unused bits of a pointer, but

• marcosdumay 4y ago
  > What is missing? Fast memory, addressable by the core. The one that is there, but can only used by accessing the slow memory.
  • hinkley 4y ago
    And praying that the slow memory is magically in the fast memory. I think ultimately what I'm asking for means a much, much tighter bound on worst case performance, but at the cost of best case performance. That most of us never see anyway. For certain workloads, that could end up being a net positive. And there's probably some way to expose CPU metadata that gives some of that difference back.
    • chas 4y ago
      I think it’s worthwhile to distinguish between throughput and latency for these sorts of discussions, rather than just talking about performance since scratchpads are usually better for latency (even best-case latency) and caches are usually better for throughput. Though of course in this as in any sort of discussion of computer performance, caveats abound.