4 ms·
Just like fortran and COBOL themselves, the pre-AI / ML stuff will be around for much longer than we will be. I've been having this weird feeling lately which
by tacostakohashi 4y ago
Just like fortran and COBOL themselves, the pre-AI / ML stuff will be around for much longer than we will be.
I've been having this weird feeling lately which I figure must also be what the fortran / cobol / mainframe folks felt... I guess I learned to code in the late 90's / early 2000's with perl, linux, C / C++, shell, etc... which was basically just the mainstream way to do stuff at the time, nothing terribly esoteric.
Nowadays, I work at BigCorp places that have a lot of systems that have probably evolved from similar times, and it's easy for me to troubleshoot / diagnose / improve them... but the younger folks in their 20s seem pretty lost with really basic shell stuff, how to grep, how to ssh / rsync / copy files around the place, how to #! + chmod +x scripts, etc. Even after a few years on the job, they're not proficient - it's weird, because the systems still exist and probably will for decades to come, but I feel like we're only a few years away from this stuff being as esoteric (but also, still relied upon) as cobol + fortran.
- ineedausername 4y ago> Even after a few years on the job, they're not proficient - it's weird It's because they focus on high level stuff and the latest frameworks.