> But the second that people start asking AI to make VALUE JUDGMENTS for them then we have a problem. I laughed out loud when you said this not because I find

> But the second that people start asking AI to make VALUE JUDGMENTS for them then we have a problem. I laughed out loud when you said this not because I find it funny, but that I can see the conclusions people will make. This is similar to Tesla owners comparing the assisted driving features to self-driving technology. Those features have no comparison to self-driving, technology is not even close to being there yet, and it probably wont be for another 50 years. You can only understand that by having some history around what computers are capable of and most people don't have that kind of knowledge. So when I here about people wanting to use the technology to make value judgments, I also become concerned, not necessarily because people are stupid to even think language models are even remotely able to do this, but people that aim to create power differentials between themselves and people will use this ignorance to strengthen autocratic systems by supporting the hype around it while at the same time encouraging and actively supporting its misuse by developing adversarial models to keep people stuck in needing something outside themselves to give life meaning.