4 ms·
> And nowadays people go scrutinize the scientific papers ... and there aren't any. That's provably not true, there are many bad scientific papers out there.
by than3 4y ago
> And nowadays people go scrutinize the scientific papers ... and there aren't any.
That's provably not true, there are many bad scientific papers out there.
If its bad science in the first place, nothing downstream is ever going to be credible.
- marcosdumay 4y agoThere was never much scientific discussion about Earth entering an ice age. So there aren't papers there, neither good nor bad. There was something about fixed frequency cycles on our climate, that were the source of the thing. But those don't say anything not even similar to what the press run with.
- than3 4y agoThat's because anthropologists are very particular about their methodology, and which papers get accepted for peer review. We've known about precession, but since these cycles occur in the tens of thousands of years, and each cycle is usually offset by some cataclysmic event, little actual evidence remains.