5 ms·
It somewhat makes sense to me. Measuring all the time, you're susceptible to odd readings that are essentially false positives. If your device has a 1/1000 fals
by noirbot 4y ago
It somewhat makes sense to me. Measuring all the time, you're susceptible to odd readings that are essentially false positives. If your device has a 1/1000 false positive rate, but you're usually only making one reading with it at a time, that's maybe acceptable. If you're making a million readings over a week because you're checking every second, than you're almost definitely going to have it show the same false positive enough that it looks real.
- Dylan16807 4y agoBut the situation you describe only makes it look real if you were trained incorrectly, so that's a very important factor.
- secabeen 4y agoYep, it's a form of the Base Rate Fallacy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy