5 ms·

You're just extending the lines in a way you like to imagine. Kinda like wishing for flying cars when we can't even make them navigate 2D city streets autonomou

You're just extending the lines in a way you like to imagine. Kinda like wishing for flying cars when we can't even make them navigate 2D city streets autonomously.

Nihilartikel 4y ago
Exactly! Nobody should imagine and articulate any possibilities unless they are sure they will be correct. It's so embarrassing.
- namaria 4y ago
  You just did the same thing with what I said to draw a ridiculous conclusion and attack that...
lkschubert8 4y ago
Isn't flight autopilot an easier problem than ground vehicle autopilot?
- namaria 4y ago
  In airliners that cruise for hours at 3 times the height of the highest mountains...
- hardlianotion 4y ago
  Yes
- nradov 4y ago
  Flight autopilot is easy if you only have to fly from one point to another. The hard part is dealing with emergencies. We are far from being able to build an autopilot that could react as well as the human crew did during US Airways flight 1549.
BiteCode_dev 4y ago
I don't have to imagine anything since I'm already delegating part of the job I used to send to my own secretary to AI, such as: - reading boring documents and giving me the gist of it - classifying my emails - checking for typos and problems in my writing - writing the boiler plate of documents - translating doc - doing basic search on a topic, such as legal obligations that haven't change in the last 2 years It's cheaper than my secretary, faster, and has roughly the same error rate for those tasks. I have to double check her work anyway. With plugins, people are already making stuff like booking a plane, another thing my secretary does. It will expend.
- namaria 4y ago
  So you're comfortable giving a black box secretary powers, including accessing and using remote APIs on your behalf, while you have zero insight or control over its decisions? Or will you be second guessing it every step of the way rendering it little more then a fancy autocomplete? I don't think you realize the amount of risk involved in giving these opaque probabilistic systems control over data and compute. They are not people replacements and assuming so and acting on it will create more problems than it solves... Because extending thee lines to wrap around your needs is wishful thinking and there is a lot more complexity and hidden unintended consequences than assumed when saying chatbots capable of using APIs will be dependable personal assistants, which is the point I'm trying to make.

You're just extending the lines in a way you like to imagine. Kinda like wishing for flying cars when we can't even make them navigate 2D city streets autonomously.

Nihilartikel 4y ago

Exactly! Nobody should imagine and articulate any possibilities unless they are sure they will be correct. It's so embarrassing.

namaria 4y ago
You just did the same thing with what I said to draw a ridiculous conclusion and attack that...

lkschubert8 4y ago

Isn't flight autopilot an easier problem than ground vehicle autopilot?

namaria 4y ago
In airliners that cruise for hours at 3 times the height of the highest mountains...
hardlianotion 4y ago
Yes
nradov 4y ago
Flight autopilot is easy if you only have to fly from one point to another. The hard part is dealing with emergencies. We are far from being able to build an autopilot that could react as well as the human crew did during US Airways flight 1549.

BiteCode_dev 4y ago

I don't have to imagine anything since I'm already delegating part of the job I used to send to my own secretary to AI, such as: - reading boring documents and giving me the gist of it - classifying my emails - checking for typos and problems in my writing - writing the boiler plate of documents - translating doc - doing basic search on a topic, such as legal obligations that haven't change in the last 2 years It's cheaper than my secretary, faster, and has roughly the same error rate for those tasks. I have to double check her work anyway. With plugins, people are already making stuff like booking a plane, another thing my secretary does. It will expend.

namaria 4y ago
So you're comfortable giving a black box secretary powers, including accessing and using remote APIs on your behalf, while you have zero insight or control over its decisions? Or will you be second guessing it every step of the way rendering it little more then a fancy autocomplete? I don't think you realize the amount of risk involved in giving these opaque probabilistic systems control over data and compute. They are not people replacements and assuming so and acting on it will create more problems than it solves... Because extending thee lines to wrap around your needs is wishful thinking and there is a lot more complexity and hidden unintended consequences than assumed when saying chatbots capable of using APIs will be dependable personal assistants, which is the point I'm trying to make.