3 ms·
It shouldn't matter. If your model touched X during training, it should be seen as producing derivative work. This is the reason humans use clean room implement
by feanaro 4y ago
It shouldn't matter. If your model touched X during training, it should be seen as producing derivative work. This is the reason humans use clean room implementation techniques.
- the_gipsy 4y agoThe opposite of clean room is probably much more common.
- usrbinbash 4y ago> If your model touched X during training, it should be seen as producing derivative work. I as a programmer touched X during training (learning how to code). Is all my work now derivative because of that?
- feanaro 4y agoIf you examined the source code of a library for a specific purpose Y, then shortly afterwards went implementing another library for purpose Y, there's a high probability of your code being infringing. That's the entire premise and purpose of clean room design (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_room_design https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_room_design). Now factor in that machine models don't have a fallible or degrading memory and I think the answer is quite clear.