4 ms·

There's an xscreensaver as well fwiw You'll have to cut and paste the below link because JWZ has been slowly morphing into someone as easy to get on with as RM

by harry8 4y ago

There's an xscreensaver as well fwiw You'll have to cut and paste the below link because JWZ has been slowly morphing into someone as easy to get on with as RMS in many respects. https://www.jwz.org/blog/2018/12/xscreensaver-5-41/ https://www.jwz.org/blog/2018/12/xscreensaver-5-41/ edit: maybe not? Maybe the link is clickable without silliness nowadays?

nl 4y ago
No, still blocked. Incognito mode blocks referrer though.
justinator 4y ago
With all due respect, I don't think anyone has alleged the JWZ of sexual misconduct https://geekfeminism.fandom.com/wiki/Richard_Stallman https://geekfeminism.fandom.com/wiki/Richard_Stallman
- cpach 4y ago
  I don’t believe that anyone has tried to imply that.
SyzygistSix 4y ago
>because JWZ has been slowly morphing into someone as easy to get on with as RMS Slowly?
sangnoir 4y ago
> You'll have to cut and paste the below link because JWZ has been slowly morphing into someone as easy to get on with as RMS in many respects. This is incredibly uncharitable. Everyone has one or more communities they dislike - especially when they send a certain type of traffic your way - for jwz, HN is on his "no thanks" list. As for why, I can think of a few reasons why an old school hacker like jwz may dislike "Hacker News" and its values/ethos.
- harry8 4y ago
  Check out his public complaint that "signal leaks his phone number" and moxie's patient, thorough explanations and what followed, including the re-editing the original post. jwz is totally allowed to be as bigger ass as he likes with my blessing. So can rms. To eachother even. It's happened! Both are difficult to get on with. So what? So that's a factor in why you get a hairy testicle in an eggcup linking to jwz.org from this site. Hardly a big deal really and you're entitled to disagree and think the testicle and ranting is lovely. Not sure why you're taking offence about my pointing it out but you're entitled to for sure.

by harry8 4y ago

nl 4y ago

No, still blocked. Incognito mode blocks referrer though.

justinator 4y ago

With all due respect, I don't think anyone has alleged the JWZ of sexual misconduct https://geekfeminism.fandom.com/wiki/Richard_Stallman https://geekfeminism.fandom.com/wiki/Richard_Stallman

cpach 4y ago
I don’t believe that anyone has tried to imply that.

SyzygistSix 4y ago

>because JWZ has been slowly morphing into someone as easy to get on with as RMS Slowly?

sangnoir 4y ago

> You'll have to cut and paste the below link because JWZ has been slowly morphing into someone as easy to get on with as RMS in many respects. This is incredibly uncharitable. Everyone has one or more communities they dislike - especially when they send a certain type of traffic your way - for jwz, HN is on his "no thanks" list. As for why, I can think of a few reasons why an old school hacker like jwz may dislike "Hacker News" and its values/ethos.

harry8 4y ago
Check out his public complaint that "signal leaks his phone number" and moxie's patient, thorough explanations and what followed, including the re-editing the original post. jwz is totally allowed to be as bigger ass as he likes with my blessing. So can rms. To eachother even. It's happened! Both are difficult to get on with. So what? So that's a factor in why you get a hairy testicle in an eggcup linking to jwz.org from this site. Hardly a big deal really and you're entitled to disagree and think the testicle and ranting is lovely. Not sure why you're taking offence about my pointing it out but you're entitled to for sure.