42 ms·
All those barriers and more apply to nuclear weapons. Prior to the Manhattan Project, nobody was even sure if nuclear energy could be sufficiently weaponized.
by RcouF1uZ4gsC 4y ago
All those barriers and more apply to nuclear weapons. Prior to the Manhattan Project, nobody was even sure if nuclear energy could be sufficiently weaponized.
The biggest barrier to bio weapons is, I think motivation. Bio weapons are hard to target effectively and there is a chance of blowback. In addition, unlike nuclear weapons, they are not as useful against military targets. A nuclear bomb can annihilate a tank column. However, every major military has the capability of offering bio weapons protection to its soldiers (for example filtration systems in tanks).
In addition, because of incubation, etc, the country you are targeting always has the time for retaliation, if not with bio weapons then with nuclear weapons.
Thus it is not clear what bio weapons buy a country that nuclear weapons don’t.
- Avicebron 4y agoDepending on the source...plausible deniability
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- PradeetPatel 4y agoOne also should take the ethical consideration of deploying a bio weapon into consideration. The world has moved beyond realpolitik and the age old "might makes right" attitude, to use biological warfare in an unethical manner would result in condemnation from the international community.
- hdhuegau6hfhd 4y agoI so wish that to be true, but if Ukraine proved anything, it is exactly that might is right is alive is well ( for example, Germany only buckled after nordstream blew up or India just saying no to US restrictions on gas purchases ).