6 ms·
You clearly have not read anything regarding the capabilities of GPT-4 and also clearly have not played around with ChatGPT at all. GPT-4 has already displayed
by bigtex88 4y ago
You clearly have not read anything regarding the capabilities of GPT-4 and also clearly have not played around with ChatGPT at all. GPT-4 has already displayed a multitude of emergent capabilities.
This is incredibly ignorant and I expect better from this forum.
- nradov 4y agoBullshit. I have used the various LLM tools and have read extensively about them. They have not displayed any emergent capabilities in an AGI sense. Your comment is simply ignorant.
- bigtex88 4y agoI'm going to just assume you're not being malicious. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/sparks-of-artificial-general-intelligence-early-experiments-with-gpt-4/ https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/sparks-... https://www.assemblyai.com/blog/emergent-abilities-of-large-language-models/ https://www.assemblyai.com/blog/emergent-abilities-of-large-... If you'd like you can define "emergent capabilities in an AGI sense".
- nradov 4y agoI am not being malicious. I do not accept those papers as being actual examples of emergent behavior in a true AGI sense. This is just another case of humans imagining that they see patterns in noise. In other words, they haven't rejected the null hypothesis. Junk science. (And just because the science is bad doesn't mean the underlying products aren't useful for solving practical problems and enhancing human productivity.) The blowhards who are calling for arbitrary restrictions on research are the ones being malicious.
- bigtex88 4y agoOK you're moving the goalposts and just flat-out saying that you know better than the actual researchers in the field. That's fine, and it's what I was assuming you were going to say, but I appreciate you being open about it.