3 ms·
The example was redrawing something by hand that was computer generated originally. It would be pretty much impossible for a hand drawn work of art to not be s
by staticman2 4y ago
The example was redrawing something by hand that was computer generated originally.
It would be pretty much impossible for a hand drawn work of art to not be sufficiently original. Hand drawn art doesn't look the same as what a computer produces. Originality has a very low threshold, simply pointing my camera at something and hitting click is almost always enough to show originality.
At any rate it isn't fraud to take the legal position that you are an original enough artist to have copyright in the work. If taking a legal position was "fraud" any attorney who lost a court motion would be whisked away to jail.
Edited to add: the copyright registration form asks if you are the "author" not if you are "original."
- LegitShady 4y agoIf you think you own a design because you hand drew a version of it someone else invented, you're gonna have a bad time. Please redraw a superman picture someone else made and then go to have it copyrighted, and tell me how that goes for you.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- staticman2 4y agoIt would go fine, since I see the form has a question "is this a derivative work". I put yes, and this means my claim is only for what was original to me when I drew the drawing based on another drawing of Superman. But I see we've moved away from the orignal point that it would be difficult for anybody to know an AI helped someone make the drawing if they redrew and didn't disclose it was a redrawing.