3 ms·
You have absolutely no idea about climatology and are just parroting garbage. You're not a climate scientist, you have no idea how scientists reach the conclus
by Daishiman 4y ago
You have absolutely no idea about climatology and are just parroting garbage.
You're not a climate scientist, you have no idea how scientists reach the conclusions they have, you don't understand the evidentiary lineages that have brought us to the current understanding of the climate. You cite a single paper yet conveniently ignore the entirety of the research being carried out throughout the globe, by agencies and institutions with no relationship to each other, all reaching the same conclusions.
You haven't even the slightest understanding about the climate yet you claim "propaganda".
- revelio 4y ago"You cite a single paper" It's not a paper, so this makes me think you didn't read the cited document. "by agencies and institutions with no relationship to each other" They're all closely related to each other and tend to rely on the same small number of data sources to draw conclusions, which is why the fact that these data sources are subject to continuous retroactive editing is a problem.