2 ms·
I think summarized news is probably too risky in a polarized world. Maybe it's ok for some kinds of news: say a sports section that gives you a few sentences a
by logicalmonster 4y ago
I think summarized news is probably too risky in a polarized world.
Maybe it's ok for some kinds of news: say a sports section that gives you a few sentences about the daily games and player transactions. Or maybe it's ok for a science section, quick-hitting movie reviews, or just for getting a gist of random global news you don't know too much about and that don't impact you personally too much.
But there's no way I'd trust any summarized news about polarizing topics without extra detail.
- ChildOfChaos 4y agoYes, but in a world of information overload, I think you need tools to give you a summary of what is out there, so you can choose what to read and what to follow up more effectively, it would be a tool to help you curate.
- mejutoco 4y agoI often check these reuters news and they do fine with all sort of topics. https://www.reuters.com/news/archive/us-the-wire https://www.reuters.com/news/archive/us-the-wire Detailed or not anything can be polarized. If anything, it is more difficult to hide in shorter texts.
- vasili111 4y agoI think he was meaning the AI summarized news and not human summarized like Reuters does.