> Aren't tight capitol controls seen as a good thing? Surprised to see that as a con. it depends on which side you are. I myself prefer that the state cannot

> Aren't tight capitol controls seen as a good thing? Surprised to see that as a con. it depends on which side you are. I myself prefer that the state cannot easily regulate and control capital, but not impossible for them to in dire cases. E.g., they can control capital flow of criminals, but would need proof or courts involved. They cannot defacto control capital at will for an ordinary citizen.