4 ms·
But... even if AI replaces all mental work (it won't), non-mental work won't disappear. In this hypothetical scenario, mental workers would transition to physi
by RivieraKid 4y ago
But... even if AI replaces all mental work (it won't), non-mental work won't disappear.
In this hypothetical scenario, mental workers would transition to physical workers.
There will be more construction workers, doctors, plumbers, hairdressers. This means the society will be able to produce and consume more and / or work less. And the society would be less equal.
The drawback for some "white collar" workers would be that it would mean a decrease in wage and status.
The talk about unemployment and a need for UBI is economically illiterate. In fact, I would argue UBI would be less needed in that scenario. Because the point of UBI is really to decrease income inequality - which would be less of a problem than today.
- marcosdumay 4y agoIn "all mental work" do you include the work of designing robots? But anyway, "and the society would be less equal" is really unwarranted. That's exactly the article's point. Wealth distribution doesn't need to be related to the labor demand, it is only this way today because of politicy decisions.
- RivieraKid 4y agoYes. And like I said, I obviously don't expect all mental work to be replaceable by GPT-4 level AI. Oh sorry, I meant to say that the society would be less inequal and more equal.