2 ms·
>Was Amazon being a patent troll patenting single-click-to-purchase? // Just on that example. I think Amazon were fine to get a monopoly (in USA) on commercial
by pbhjpbhj 4y ago
>Was Amazon being a patent troll patenting single-click-to-purchase? //
Just on that example. I think Amazon were fine to get a monopoly (in USA) on commercial implementation of one-click. But realistically it's worth a couple of years at most of monopoly for something which arises naturally out of the progress of the web, which Amazon rode the wave of (and contributed to). Locking that up for 20 years doesn't serve society; it's clearly anti-democratic [ie against the best interests of society as a whole] to have that extended term for business methods/software.
In this case it's trivial to work around, but that's not true of all 'small idea' patents.
This is if course my personal opinion, unrelated to my employment.
- account42 4y ago> I think Amazon were fine to get a monopoly (in USA) on commercial implementation of one-click. But who benefits from that other than Amazon when, as you say, it arose naturally. Does anyone think one-click purchase is something that would never have existed if not for Amazon?