2 ms·
A narrower question: can we perhaps stop putting AGI and ChatGPT in the same paragraphs as if they are somehow relevant to each other? Intelligence has very lit
by cornholio 4y ago
A narrower question: can we perhaps stop putting AGI and ChatGPT in the same paragraphs as if they are somehow relevant to each other? Intelligence has very little to do with a glorified Google search trained by statistical crunching of superhuman amounts of data; there is not even a chicken-sized trace of intelligence in ChatGPT that is not a reflection of the training set or of the embedded human-designed models it uses to mimicry problem solving and conversation.
- nopinsight 4y agoSeveral necessary ingredients of human intelligence are present in GPT-4: complex pattern matching, abstraction from concrete examples and apply the abstract patterns to new examples, pattern interpolation, basic reasoning. This is evident by its ability to generalize from the training set to new problems within many domains. It's still unable to generalize as well as a smart human beyond the distribution it was specifically trained on, which is evident by its poor performance on AMC, Leetcode medium and hard, and Codeforces problems. But most humans are not great at these kinds of problems either. Benchmark and test results: https://openai.com/research/gpt-4 https://openai.com/research/gpt-4