3 ms·
I'm not sure how you reconcile acknowledging the reality of companies not being able to make payroll for two weeks and also calling it a "canard" in back to bac
by bogomipz 4y ago
I'm not sure how you reconcile acknowledging the reality of companies not being able to make payroll for two weeks and also calling it a "canard" in back to back sentences. A "fake canard" would be a double negative by the way ;)
If you reread the thread and the context of what I was responding to it was the OP stating "It's not clear anyone would have lost anything at all ..."
Perhaps you are well-off but losing a pay check for couple of weeks has real consequences for lots of people.
- Dylan16807 4y ago> Perhaps you are well-off but losing a pay check for couple of weeks has real consequences for lots of people. They're arguing that companies could already make payroll just fine with access to half their balance. A 100% guarantee was not necessary.
- bogomipz 4y agoIf your payroll plus all other outgoing expenses was greater than $250K then no you would not be able to "make payroll just fine." This is simple math. Arguing against basic math is absurd.
- Dylan16807 4y agoI said half their balance. I didn't say anything about 250k. Please reread the comment thread.