3 ms·
I always looked upon Scientific Linux as the CentOS replacement. https://scientificlinux.org/ https://scientificlinux.org/
by anonymousiam 4y ago
I always looked upon Scientific Linux as the CentOS replacement.
https://scientificlinux.org/ https://scientificlinux.org/
- scheme271 4y agoScientific Linux was killed in 2019 although security releases for SL 6 and 7 will probably continue as long as Centos 6 and 7 get them. I'd go with AlmaLinux or Rocky Linux if you want to something that's a free copy of RHEL 8 or 9
- jaboutboul 4y agoCERN chose to move forward with AlmaLinux: https://linux.web.cern.ch/which/ https://linux.web.cern.ch/which/
- chronogram 4y agoThat's mostly replaced by Alma with the CERN repository: https://linux.web.cern.ch/which/ https://linux.web.cern.ch/which/
- red-iron-pine 4y agoRockyLinux is by the guy who did CentOS, and seeks to follow it's principles. Scientific Linux is no longer a thing, essentially; from wikipedia: > In April 2019, it was announced that feature development for Scientific Linux would be discontinued, but that maintenance will continue to be provided for the 6.x and 7.x releases through the end of their life cycles. Fermilab and CERN will utilize CentOS Stream[4] and AlmaLinux[5] for their deployment of 8.x release instead.
- carlwgeorge 4y ago> RockyLinux is by the guy who did CentOS, and seeks to follow it's principles. Not quite. Back in 2003, when folks were first coming up with the idea of creating a distro that matched RHEL as closely as possible, Greg Kurtzer (the Rocky founder) explicitly stated that he would be interested in helping host it, but that he was "totally not interested" in leading it. https://web.archive.org/web/20040909231336/http://www.caosity.org/pipermail/caos/2003-September/000959.html https://web.archive.org/web/20040909231336/http://www.caosit... It wasn't until much later (~2019) that he started trying to retcon history by claiming he was the original CentOS founder.