Then it’s a bad analogy, because eating is necessary. Sex is not. Some amount of sex is inevitable but it does not preclude you from teaching abstinence as the

Then it’s a bad analogy, because eating is necessary. Sex is not. Some amount of sex is inevitable but it does not preclude you from teaching abstinence as the ideal. And teaching abstinence as the ideal doesn’t mean you have shun condoms. What motivates people to create this false dichotomy? Perhaps the worst possible thing we could teach kids about their biological urge to have sex is that they can’t control it.