5 ms·

I wish there was something like MRSK for deploying generic Dockerfiles onto VMs from scratch, without the mess of Kubernetes or needing to use Rails. Like, pro

I wish there was something like MRSK for deploying generic Dockerfiles onto VMs from scratch, without the mess of Kubernetes or needing to use Rails. Like, provision Hetzner -> pass the IP address to the tool + a Dockerfile -> your image Just Works on the server and restarts if it crashes.

nwienert 4y ago
Docker Swarm is very underrated, more for multiple apps but you can of course just have one.
jordemort 4y ago
I think this is what MRSK is? There's no Kubernetes. It even installs Docker for you.
jahsome 4y ago
I may be ignorant but doesn't that scenario you described encapsulate how MRSK functions? From the MRSK readme[1]: Connect to the servers over SSH (using root by default, authenticated by your ssh key) Install Docker on any server that might be missing it (using apt-get) Log into the registry both locally and remotely Build the image using the standard Dockerfile in the root of the application. Push the image to the registry. Pull the image from the registry onto the servers. Ensure Traefik is running and accepting traffic on port 80. Ensure your app responds with 200 OK to GET /up. Start a new container with the version of the app that matches the current git version hash. Stop the old container running the previous version of the app. Prune unused images and stopped containers to ensure servers don't fill up. --- 1. https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk#readme https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk#readme
andrewmutz 4y ago
I don't think you need to use rails to use MRSK
stavros 4y ago
I wrote something to do just that: https://gitlab.com/stavros/harbormaster https://gitlab.com/stavros/harbormaster SSH into the server, run the Docker container, give it a config file with the images you want to run, and it handles everything else automatically.
mr_ndrsn 4y ago
mrsk doesn't require rails. It makes no assumptions about what you're running, we deploy a golang service with it. mrsk does require a ruby install on your machine, tho.
- KingOfCoders 4y ago
  I would be very interested in that, do you have a writeup?
  - mr_ndrsn 4y ago
    I don't think there's a writeup out there, but mrsk just uses docker under the hood. So, if you have a CMD in your Dockerfile, it will use that. If you have an image that can run multiple things, like a rails app that can run the app process for web traffic by default, but it can also run job workers with the right command, you can provide the cmd in the mrsk config. You can see this in the jobs role in the example: https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk#using-different-roles-for-servers https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk#using-different-roles-for-ser....
    - KingOfCoders 4y ago
      Thanks!
e12e 4y ago
> Like, provision Hetzner -> pass the IP address to the tool + a Dockerfile -> your image Just Works on the server and restarts if it crashes. This is MRSK. It's just that rails now comes with a dockerfile. And your service need a health check.
fbdab103 4y ago
Dokku[0] does exactly that. Feels a very similar space to mrsk, but has been around for several years now. [0] https://dokku.com/ https://dokku.com/

nwienert 4y ago

Docker Swarm is very underrated, more for multiple apps but you can of course just have one.

jordemort 4y ago

I think this is what MRSK is? There's no Kubernetes. It even installs Docker for you.

jahsome 4y ago

I may be ignorant but doesn't that scenario you described encapsulate how MRSK functions? From the MRSK readme[1]: Connect to the servers over SSH (using root by default, authenticated by your ssh key) Install Docker on any server that might be missing it (using apt-get) Log into the registry both locally and remotely Build the image using the standard Dockerfile in the root of the application. Push the image to the registry. Pull the image from the registry onto the servers. Ensure Traefik is running and accepting traffic on port 80. Ensure your app responds with 200 OK to GET /up. Start a new container with the version of the app that matches the current git version hash. Stop the old container running the previous version of the app. Prune unused images and stopped containers to ensure servers don't fill up. --- 1. https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk#readme https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk#readme

andrewmutz 4y ago

I don't think you need to use rails to use MRSK

stavros 4y ago

I wrote something to do just that: https://gitlab.com/stavros/harbormaster https://gitlab.com/stavros/harbormaster SSH into the server, run the Docker container, give it a config file with the images you want to run, and it handles everything else automatically.

mr_ndrsn 4y ago

mrsk doesn't require rails. It makes no assumptions about what you're running, we deploy a golang service with it. mrsk does require a ruby install on your machine, tho.

KingOfCoders 4y ago
I would be very interested in that, do you have a writeup?
- mr_ndrsn 4y ago
  I don't think there's a writeup out there, but mrsk just uses docker under the hood. So, if you have a CMD in your Dockerfile, it will use that. If you have an image that can run multiple things, like a rails app that can run the app process for web traffic by default, but it can also run job workers with the right command, you can provide the cmd in the mrsk config. You can see this in the jobs role in the example: https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk#using-different-roles-for-servers https://github.com/mrsked/mrsk#using-different-roles-for-ser....
  - KingOfCoders 4y ago
    Thanks!

e12e 4y ago

> Like, provision Hetzner -> pass the IP address to the tool + a Dockerfile -> your image Just Works on the server and restarts if it crashes. This is MRSK. It's just that rails now comes with a dockerfile. And your service need a health check.

fbdab103 4y ago

Dokku[0] does exactly that. Feels a very similar space to mrsk, but has been around for several years now. [0] https://dokku.com/ https://dokku.com/