6 ms·
Yes, this is a growing stage. In one or two years LLMs will have Wikipedia quality or even research paper quality. The spam they will produce might be better th
by visarga 4y ago
Yes, this is a growing stage. In one or two years LLMs will have Wikipedia quality or even research paper quality. The spam they will produce might be better than most human written stuff.
- bugcheck7b 4y agoIf the spam is better quality than the human written stuff, who's to say we aren't better off?
- lanternfish 4y agoQuality in this case doesn't necessarily mean ground truth accuracy - it just means ability to look accurate to humans.
- fauigerzigerk 4y agoI agree, that's the problem, but I think it's still somewhat complicated. Imagine someone posting an extremely well written and insightful postmortem of an outage. It would show advanced and accurate usage of all kinds of tools to get to the bottom of the outage. It would be extremely useful reading for anyone investigating a similar outage, but the outage never actually occurred. Now you have both ground truth accuracy and misleading fiction at the same time. Whether or not that makes the post useful depends entirely on the conclusions you're drawing from it.
- ithkuil 4y agoAt which point does high quality spam cease to be spam?