4 ms·
Of note is that this is the opinion of one person, and he depends on his interpretation of LLMs being able to present information of its own. It is a gray area
by tomohelix 4y ago
Of note is that this is the opinion of one person, and he depends on his interpretation of LLMs being able to present information of its own.
It is a gray area for sure. LLMs might present remixed information already available and the current ones are definitely being crafted specifically to not give any "opinion" of its own. But hallucinations can be used to show these AIs are actually providing "new" information and thus are providers.
Regardless, I do not trust the dinosaurs in congress and the supreme court to actually understand this tech and give it a fair judgement.
- nonethewiser 4y ago> Regardless, I do not trust the dinosaurs in congress and the supreme court to actually understand this tech and give it a fair judgement. Good. Nothing should be done. The government doesn’t need to rule on everything. Let’s wait until there is a real problem before developing new rules.
- joseph8th 4y agoReally depends on how we define "information" right? In a very real sense, everything GPT outputs is simply noise. It only seems like information to pattern-recognizing animals like us. It's meaningless to another computer. In this sense, also, everything a GPT bot pumps out is generated fiction until human minds validate the veracity of the output. It HAS NO MEANING until read by a human being.