4 ms·
> Overall, we don't see JPEG-XL performing enough better than its closest competitors (like AVIF) to justify addition on that basis alone The progressive enhan
by pmarreck 4y ago
> Overall, we don't see JPEG-XL performing enough better than its closest competitors (like AVIF) to justify addition on that basis alone
The progressive enhancement feature alone could be quite amazing, and its competitors don’t offer that- No more thumbnail generation! Its competitors can’t offer that! Do they realize how many security holes everyone’s use of “ImageTragick” generates, and how much caching infrastructure is devoted to images?
also, how does he fail to see this as a potential competitive advantage over browser competitors?
- Eisenstein 4y ago> Do they realize how many security holes everyone’s use of “ImageTragick” generates Can you expound on this?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- pmarreck 4y agohttps://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-1749/Imagemagick.html https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-1749... No less than 630 vulnerabilities, and almost everyone uses this library, although VIPS is gaining tiny marketshare.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]