4 ms·
I'm afraid that you're wrong. See page 11. https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/stanfordlanguage.pdf https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/stanfo
by coder9874 4y ago
I'm afraid that you're wrong. See page 11. https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/stanfordlanguage.pdf https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/stanfordlanguag....
Stanford seems to have beaten the "anti-woke trolls" at their own game.
- OmegaPoint 4y ago> trigger warning > The phrase can cause stress about what's to follow. Additionally, one can never know what may or may not trigger a particular person.
- IshKebab 4y agoHmm can't say I entirely disagree with them on that one. I mean it's clearly not a harmful phrase but it definitely is a useless one. It carries almost zero information. Who is going to read "trigger warning" and think "oo they know that I'm highly sensitive about this specific unknown subject. I don't want to get triggered, I'll stop!" Contrast it with something like "spoilers" where everyone agrees on what it means and people generally really don't want to read spoilers.
- mhouse 4y agoThe document you linked doesn't mention "victims of gun violence". It contradicts your original claim.